The Roman limes road between Călugăreni and Sărățeni

Cercetări Arheologice 29.1, 2022, 131-142
https://doi.org/10.46535/ca.29.1.06



The Roman limes road between Călugăreni and Sărățeni


Authors: Levente Daczó Szilamér-Péter Pánczél

Keywords:

limes road, least cost path, survey, dupondius, Dacia

Abstract:

The present paper focuses on the Roman limes road between the auxiliary forts of Călugăreni / Mikháza and Sărățeni / Sóvárad. Even though, since the early 18th century there has been scarce data concerning a Roman road through the Becheci / Bekecs Hill, the issue needed to be reanalysed. Based on a least cost path analysis and earlier survey data, we managed in February 2021 to identify through field survey the course of the former Roman road.

Download: PDF


How to cite: Levente Daczó, Szilamér-Péter Pánczél, The Roman limes road between Călugăreni and Sărățeni, Cercetări Arheologice, Vol. 29.1, pag. 131-142, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.46535/ca.29.1.06


Bibliography


  1. 1st, 2nd and 3rd Military Survey of the Habsburg Empire and Austria-Hungary. Accessed on 1st of February 2022. https://maps.arcanum.com/en/browse/country/
  2. Ackner, M. J. 1856. Die römischen Alterthümer und deutschen Burgen in Siebenbürgen. Jahrbuch der K.K. Central-Commission zur Erforschung und Erhaltung der Baudenkmale 1: 3-50.
  3. Ackner, M. J. 1857. Die Colonien und militärischen Standlager der Römer in Dacien im heutigen Siebenbürgen. Jahrbuch der K.K. Central-Commission zur Erforschung und Erhaltung der Baudenkmale 2: 63-100.
  4. Abou Diwan, G. and Doumit, J. 2017. The Berytus-Heliopolis Baalbak road in the Roman period: A least cost path analysis. Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry 17(3): 225-241.
  5. Antrop, M. and Wiedemann, T. 2001. Using GIS to Study Ancient Linear Marks, in: Vermeulen, F. and Antrop, M. (eds.) Ancient Lines in the Landscape: a geo-Archaeological Study of Protohistoric and Roman Roads and Fields Systems in Northwestern Gaul: 43-66. Leuven: Peeters Publishers.
  6. Bartalis, A. 1787. Ortus et occasus imperii Romanorum in Dacia mediterranea cui accedunt nonnullae de monumento quodam e ruderibus coloniae Apulensis eruto opiniones. Posonii: Simonis Petri Weber.
  7. Bărbulescu, M. 2005. Atlas-dicționar al Daciei Romane, Publicațiile Institutului de studii clasice 6. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Tribuna.
  8. Benkő, K. 1868-1869. Marosszék ismertetése. Kolozsvár: Római Katholikus Lyceum.
  9. Conolly, J. and Lake, M. 2006. Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology, Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Christescu, V. 1937, Istoria militară a Daciei romane. București: Fundația Regele Carol I.
  11. Dobos, A., Fiedler, M., Höpken, C., Mustață, S. and Pánczél, Sz. P. 2017. Militärlager und vicus in Călugăreni/Mikháza (Kreis Mureş, Rumänien) am Dakischen Ostlimes. Kölner und Bonner Archaeologica 7: 145-154.
  12. Ercsei, J. 1830. Római út-nyomozás, a’ Bekecs körűl. Nemzeti Társalkodó 52: 409-412.
  13. Esri. ArcGIS blog: Setting the Z Factor parameter correctly. Accessed on 1st of February 2022. https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/product/imagery/setting-the-z-factor-parameter-correctly/ .
  14. Fodorean, F. 2006. Drumurile din Dacia romană, Publicațiile Institutului de studii clasice 7. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Napoca Star.
  15. Fodorean, F. 2020. Mapping Roman Dacia: The road connecting the valley of the River Mureș with the fort at Călugăreni. Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology 7(2): 178-184. Accessed on 1st of February 2022. DOI: 10.14795/j.v7i2.519.
  16. Gislounge: Overview of Least Cost Path Analysis. Accessed on 1st of February 2022. https://www.gislounge.com/overview-least-cost-path-analysis/ .
  17. Gudea, N. 1996. Porolissum. Vama romană, Bibliotheca Mvsei Napocensis 12. Cluj-Napoca: Muzeul Național de Istorie a Transilvaniei.
  18. Gudea, N. 1997. Der dakische Limes. Materialien zur seiner Geschichte. Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseum Mainz 44: 1-113.
  19. Herzog, I. 2014a. A review of case studies in archaeological least-cost analysis. Archeologia e Calcolatori 25: 223-239.
  20. Herzog, I. 2014b. Least-cost Paths – Some Methodological Issues, Internet Archaeology 36: 48-67. Accessed on 1st of February 2022. DOI: 10.11141/ia.36.5.
  21. Herzog, I. 2020. Spatial analysis based on cost functions, in: Gillings, M., Hacigüzeller P. and Lock, G. (eds.) Archaeological Spatial Analysis: A Methodological Guide to GIS: 333-358. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  22. Herzog, I. and Schröer, S. 2019. Reconstruction of Roman Roads and Boundaries in Southern Germany, in: Börner, W. and Uhlirz, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies 2017, CHNT 22, 2017: 1-19. Vienna: Museen der Stadt Wien.
  23. Hodza, P. and Butler, K. A. 2022. Juxtaposing GIS and Archaeologically Mapped Ancient Road Routes. Geographies 2, 48-67. Accessed on 1st of February 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies2010005 .
  24. Höpken, C., Fiedler, M. and Oberhofer, K. 2020. Ausgrabungen im vicus von Călugăreni / Mikháza, Kreis Mureș (Rumänien), Marisia. Archaeologia, Historia, Patrimonium 2: 101–118.
  25. Lattyák, S. 1918. Limes nyomok a „Görgényi hegyekben”. Dolgozatok az Erdélyi Nemzeti Múzeum Érem- és régiségtárából 8/1-2: 218-232.
  26. Lazăr, G. 1995. Repertoriul arheologic al judeţului Mureş. Târgu Mureş: Casa de Editură ”Mureș”.
  27. Ludwig, B. 2020. Reconstructing the Ancient Route Network in Pergamon’s Surroundings. Land 9(8), 241: 1-39. Accessed on 1st of February 2022. DOI: 10.3390/land9080241.
  28. Macrea, M. 1969. Viaţa în Dacia romană. Bucureşti: Editura Științifică.
  29. Marcu, F. 2009. Organizarea internă a castrelor din Dacia, Bibliotheca Mvsei Napocensis 30. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Mega.
  30. Neigebaur, J. F. 1851. Dacien. Aus den Ueberresten des klassischen Alterthums, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf Siebenbürgen. Kronstadt: Johann Gött.
  31. Orbán, B. 1870. A Székelyföld leírása történelmi, régészeti, természetrajzi s népismei szempontból IV. Pest: Ráth Mór Kiadása.
  32. Paulovics, I. 1944. Dacia keleti határvonala és az úgynevezett “dák”-ezüstkincsek kérdése. Kolozsvár: Minerva Irodalmi és Nyomdai Műintézet.
  33. Pánczél, Sz. P. 2015. The Roman Fort from Călugăreni (Mureș County, Romania), in: Vagalinski, L. and Sharankov N. (eds.) LIMES XXII. Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress of Roman Frontier Studies Ruse, Bulgaria, September 2012: 909–916, Sofia: National Archaeological Institute with Museum.
  34. Pánczél, Sz. P., Mustață, S. and Dobos, A. 2018. A Mikházi római segédcsapattábor kutatása / The research at the Roman auxiliary fort of Mikháza/Călugăreni, Magyar Régészet Online Magazin/ Hungarian Archaeology E-Journal 2018 Spring: 13–20. Accessed on 1st of February 2022. http://files.archaeolingua.hu/2018TA/Pa%b4ncze%b4l_E18TA.pdf   
  35. Planurile directoare de tragere. Accessed on 1st of February 2022. http://geo-spatial.org/harti/#/viewer/openlayers/10 .
  36. Steinberg, St. and Steinberg, Sh. 2005. Geographic information systems for social sciences. Investigating time and place. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  37. Székely, Z. 1960. Săpăturile executate de Muzeul regional din Sf. Gheorghe, Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice 7: 179–340.
  38. Székely, Z. 1962. Sondajele executate de Muzeul regional din Sf. Gheorghe, Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice 8: 325–340.
  39. Tudor, D. 1968. Oraşe, tîrguri şi sate în Dacia romană. Bucureşti: Editura Științifică.
  40. Țentea, O., Matei-Popescu, Fl. și Călina, V. 2021, Frontiera romană din Dacia Inferior. O trecere în revistă și o actualizare. 1, Cercetari Arheologice 28.1: 9-90.
  41. Ursuț, D. 2008. Drumurile romane din județul Cluj. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Napoca Star.

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License