The evaluation of the papers will be made by two experts, independent or affiliated with institutions other than those of the authors, who will verify the compliance with the publication rules and will make suggestions and improvement ideas. The evaluation will follow the procedures of double-blind review and will be done accordingly with the evaluation grid.
the Editorial Board and the
reviewers can make requests for the authors to review the texts and/or the
illustrations prior to publication. These issues will be resolved before the
actual editing of the materials. Similar requests may be made with respect to
the grammatical or linguistic accuracy.
articles received by the editorial team will be taken over by the editor-in-chief or the editorial office secretary who will
send copies of them (paper or electronic copies) to reviewers (experts in the
reviewers will evaluate the article according to the grid and will return it to
the editorial office, which will send the comments to the author.
The evaluation of the reviewers must include at the end one of the following recommendations for the article analyzed:
the unconditional acceptance of the article;
the acceptance of the article subject to the changes mentioned in the report;
the rejection of the article.
If the reports are opposed as a recommendation, the editor may request the opinion of a third referent.
During the review process, the following evaluation criteria will be taken into account (download):
the compliance with the publication rules and the structure of the article;
the thematic compliance of the articles with the profile of the journal;
the quality of the scientific content;
the degree of originality;
the clarity, concision and accuracy of the text of the article;
the absence of errors, misconceptions and ambiguities;
the relevance of bibliographic sources.
Apart from the evaluation process, the authors will receive one or more corrections, on a case-by-case basis, depending on the problems identified by the editor, in pdf format, where they will see any observations and requests. In this file the authors will insert their own observations, with “comment”.
deadline is 15th of February, current year.
First evaluation done
by the editors will take up to three weeks.
If the article is
accepted, it will automatically pass onto the next step, the peer-review
process. This evaluation could take up to 7 weeks and at the end of it, the
authors will receive an answer.
publication of the accepted manuscripts will be done on the 1st of
August current year.
The printed format
will be ready on the 1st of October current year.
In order to acces the entire publication schedule, please access the link here, under the headline Publication Schedule.
Rights and obligations
Authors must ensure
that the article sent for publication is original and that follows all the
rules and regulations for avoiding plagiarism. The manuscript must contain a
bibliography or list of references and cite all the sources accordingly to the
does not accept any violations of the code of ethics and does not support
Authors must follow
the guidelines for publication and citation of other works.
Both authors and
reviewers will announce the publication if there is any conflict of interest.
Reviewers must keep the confidentiality of the authors’
information and their respective papers and must be objective during the
evaluation process and follow the evaluation grid.
In order to see all the guidelines for the code of ethics and publication, norms for avoiding plagiarism and the obligations that the publication, reviewers and authors are asked to follow, please access the following link.